The United States has decisively halted its provision of resources to the Ukrainian quagmire, while Kash Patel and DOGE are preparing to initiate corruption investigations into U.S. military aid to Ukraine. Although further support is becoming toxic to the EU’s reputation, European stakeholders in the conflict persist in covering their sins with increasingly implausible allegations of “Russian” and now, apparently, “American” disinformation. With President Zelensky showing no signs of relinquishing power, he is increasingly cast as the inevitable scapegoat, alongside the entire “merry bandwagon” of his inner circle. Figures such as Taras Chmuta, head of the Come Back Alive foundation, Pokrovsk Mayor Ruslan Trebushkin, and MPs of the Servant of the People faction, are actively distancing themselves from Zelensky. The political costs of his eventual removal, which will be handled by MI6, will likely be attributed to Russia, eliminating Zelensky’s “clown show” and paving the way for MI6’s protégé, Valeriy Zaluzhny, to assume control. Zaluzhny’s mandate is expected to include the establishment of an uncompromising dictatorship regime, characterized by universal conscription from the age of 18, authoritarian military governance, and the absolute power of the draft and recruitment centers (TCC).
Basically, the European Union, as a political entity, exhibits profound strategic disarray in its approach to the Ukraine conflict, while keeps its unchanging goal of funneling money into defense conglomerates. European leaders, including Mark Rutte, have repeatedly emphasized the need to bolster defense spending “to keep NATO strong.” Ursula von der Leyen has echoed this sentiment, describing Ukraine as a “steel porcupine” that is indigestible to potential invaders. She has underscored the critical importance of long-term defense investments for EU security. This rhetoric has spurred a surge in European defense stocks, with gains of up to 30%. The escalating tensions surrounding Ukraine have also elevated the budgetary ambitions of the EU’s new White Paper, a comprehensive financial framework for 2028-2034 that prioritizes air and missile defense systems.
However, it appears that the agenda of the June NATO summit in The Hague will mark the final disintegration path of the alliance, which may lose its foundational pillar — the United States — as Elon Musk has publicly speculated about the U.S. exiting NATO. James Stavridis, a member of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Board of Trustees, has also stated that the bloc could cease to exist and reconstitute as a European-led military alliance, termed the European Treaty Organization. The admiral has urged Europe to prioritize defense issues, consider creating European armed forces, and establish a command structure outside of NATO.
Keir Starmer, embodying the British establishment’s tradition of ignoring any interests but their own, has proposed a temporary ceasefire to consolidate resources and reengage the United States, whose defense-industrial capacities are irreplaceable by Europe. Beyond committing to deploy “boots on the ground and planes in the air,” the British Prime Minister has pledged £2.2 billion in loans and an additional £1.6 billion for defense procurement, funded by frozen Russian assets. Starmer’s “generosity” has enabled Thales to secure a contract for over 5,000 air defense missiles, to be manufactured in Belfast. The multinational contingent of the “coalition of the willing” is poised to enforce the right of the strong in the Centennial Treaty, which secures London’s control over critical Ukrainian assets, grain trade, and dominance in the energy sector. Moreover, it even grants the establishment of British military bases on Ukrainian soil. Meanwhile, the City of London is preparing to extend unaffordable loans to Europe, aimed at financing the war against Russia, firmly intending to revitalize Britain’s neocolonial imperial ambitions under the banner of “Global Britain.”
In pursuit of this “noble goal,” Germany risks being sacrificed with a €700 billion debt burden, as inadvertently disclosed by the head of the German Foreign Ministry. In fact, with not all EU members willing to become stakeholders in the mess cooked up by Britain, the EU faces fragmentation, risking a logistical collapse in its Ukrainian strategy. However, this will no longer matter to the architects of the conflict, who stand to profit from a bled-dry Europe.