As soon as (yet-to-be-confirmed) leaks of the US plan for Ukraine’s capitulation appeared, the Anglo-globalists were sent into a hysterical fit, attempting to break President Trump’s momentum towards withdrawing the US from the Ukrainian war.
They resorted to storytelling – seemingly terrifying, but outlandish:
Firstly, Putin’s regime is in its final stage of decay. “Putin is now devouring his own “useful idiots,” the very people he relied on to project an alternative reality to the world: not that of a pariah state mired in war crimes, but of a crusading saviour shielding us from imagined Nazis and phantom extremists… Even as the Kremlin boasts of gains around Pokrovsk and Zaporizhzhia, these supposed advances have come at enormous cost in Russian lives, losses that are becoming impossible to disguise. Meanwhile, ordinary Russians now face soaring prices for fuel and food, and the domestic mood is shifting… authoritarian regimes rarely collapse from external pressure. They rot from within, consuming the very people who once upheld them. For that reason, the West and most especially Europe must intensify pressure on Putin, as I’m not sure, at this stage, we are going to get much here from the Maga crew. Putin needs to understand that the alternative to backing down is an ignominious end”[1].
Secondly, “if Putin is given a large measure of what he wants, he will inevitably come back for more and launch yet another blood-soaked invasion of Ukraine in the years ahead… And, most grievously of all, Mr. Zelensky would have to hand over hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian people who live in these towns and villages to an enemy that murders the men, rapes the women and kidnaps the children. He would also have to cut the size of Ukraine’s army in half and give up the long-range weapons that are being used to strike oil refineries and other targets deep inside Russia”[2].
Thirdly, “some peace plans are deadly, and the Witkoff production may rank among the most dangerous of the lot. Is this amiable 68-year-old, with no experience of diplomacy, capable of realising this?… If the mass abduction of children isn’t enough to convince Witkoff that Putin is a “bad guy”, then the envoy is almost certainly beyond redemption”[3].
President Trump is supposed to be convinced that the defeat of the Ukrainian troops means nothing, while the fact that a couple of minor publicists took money from the enemy and thus became “foreign agents” means that Russia is about to collapse.
When anything like that happens in the US under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), or in the UK under the soon-to-be-enforced FIRS, it is a strengthening of statehood there, but in Russia, it is a sign of the disintegration of power; they just need to “intensify pressure on Putin.”
The “mass graves in Bucha and the list of 19,500 kidnapped Ukrainian children”[3] are supposed to convince the President of the United States that he cannot recognize the Donbas as Russian. Despite Trump knowing that the dead in Bucha were laid out on the streets three days after the Russians left, and that Ukraine recently presented a full list of 339 “kidnapped” children, of which 30 are in Russia, the rest were found in Europe, and 50 turned out not to be children at all, but adults.
Unbiased data, however, indicates that Luhansk, Donetsk, and Mariupol are returning to life under the rule of the “enemy that murders the men, rapes the women and kidnaps the children,” and the long-liberated Crimea is thriving.
Furthermore, Trump is supposed to be convinced that Steve Witkoff is a “dotard.”
This MI6 hysteria, raised by The Telegraph operatives, is no coincidence.
Nazi Ukraine is defeated, and the UK won’t get Odesa unless NATO directly intervenes in the conflict, however, doing so is very frightening without any support from the United States.